ArtOfBeing

thoughts, rants, rhapsodies, explication, documentation

Archive for April, 2006

lessons on the job

Posted by on April 28, 2006

This week out of the blue The Australian commissioned me to interview Maina Gielgud for a feature piece on her return to Australia to remount her famous Giselle. There was, as the arts editor cheerfully put it, no-one else in town who could do it. I could hardly say no — either to the money, the prestige of the engagement, or the chance to confront an old nemesis.

Gielgud began her often-stormy fourteen-year directorship of the Australian Ballet (1983-1996) a year into my own three years in the company. I am supposed to be an articulate and authoritative dance writer, but walking the warren of corridors at the Opera House to interview my former boss, the distinctive smell and texture of the backstage atmosphere is triggering flashbacks, and I am shrinking. I have hardly seen her since I left, apart from one exquisitely awkward moment a year or two later, when we met in the street on a warm Kings Cross evening, both alone; Maina on her way to dinner, me in a white dress selling roses restaurant to restaurant in the direst year of my life. It’s now twenty years on, and so much water under the bridge.

But I still blew the interview. I thought I knew her (I remembered her so vividly) but actually she was this great throbbing blind spot, and I had only the vaguest idea of what she’d done in the intervening years. I couldn’t actually have told you that she’d spent longer in Australia than she’d ever lived anywhere, that she was our longest-serving director till it all went pearshaped and the board declined to renew her contract, or even that she’d left her next three major appointments (Royal Danish, Boston, Houston) early and was freelancing again. Yet I had the temerity not to do any research before the interview.

Not so much temerity, of course, as sheer post-existential terror. I didn’t need research. I was going to a psychic confrontation. She was going to explain herself. I asked polite open-ended questions and got polite friendly answers; she explained herself and her ballet well. I even, outrageously, helped her skirt a hard issue, by saying (I have it on record) ‘I won’t ask’. Thank god I denied being a journalist.

Then of course I started the research and knew I’d fucked up — almost. I did know beforehand that I’d need to ask a couple more questions; I just hadn’t realised what they’d be. She’d been nice enough to give me her number; I had to admit my idiocy but we talked and then emailed. She was generous; I got the information I needed, just in time to get my head around it all and write the damn thing. It’s informative, if hardly incisive. At least I learned something.

Here is the link to the story in Monday’s Australian. I was impressed to see it also had a little par and photo on the main page — golly, I thought, I was expecting to have to search.

Why did I leave, all those years ago? The company itself was in transition; I was restless, uncomfortable, frustrated. Missing class is the cardinal sin in a ballet company; I started misbehaving. Lost, confused about how best to work, I was desperate for a sympathetic mentor: she told me I was talented, cried with me about my troubles, but didn’t like my attitude. I was trying to learn about life: the texture of its mysteries; its diversions and questions and contradictions. She believed we should stick to ballet. The intensity of her belief was legendary. The intensity of my certainty that it wasn’t the right way for me was its equal, but I knew and cared for nothing else except how to dance, and suddenly that was looking shaky.

Because of her famous version of a classic ballet about betrayal, I went to see a woman by whom, let’s say it, I felt betrayed. I stood before her with my customary bare minimum of competence, looked her in the eye, and finally understood. I may or may not have been wrong, but she was right. The pangs of time have taught me a just little grace; I’m ashamed now that the road back from that other, bitter place was so long and hard, but at least, at last, I know it really wasn’t her fault.

Posted in people | 3 Comments »

siren singing tomorrow

Posted by on April 22, 2006


don’t smoke in bed

Originally uploaded by Illuminata.

It’s rather slack of me not to have mentioned here (though I did send out some text messages) that Eugene and I have a gig tomorrow

Sunday afternoon, 5pm
at the Surry Hills Excelsior
64 Foveaux St
with two other excellent acts, both sassy lyrics-based guitar post-rock like us
Itu and Luke Escombe.
Entry is free.

We’re on first, so come for an afternoon beer and eight or nine of our most beautiful songs.

Posted in my gigs | 2 Comments »

doctorow in the house

Posted by on April 20, 2006

Last night Drew and I went to Popcorn Taxi to hear Cory Doctorow talk. As an aside here, Drew and I still look and act a lot like a fond couple: still close, doin’ counselling, just not sharing a room atm — so the outing was slightly complicated by the fact that it was originally suggested by a formerly mutual friend who these days (since long before we ‘broke up’ and for presumably complicated reasons) only ever invites Drew to anything but — weirdly — denies excluding me. I’m tempted to rail on about this bizarre impasse (and its attendant complications and reverberations) but I resist, because a) it’s not what I’m trying to tell you about, b) public personal grievances are not cool, and c) I have the impression that the person concerned occasionally reads me and I’d like to avoid all-out war. *sigh*

Fortunately, despite the drama therefore entailed, I didn’t end up prevented from hearing the web-wise wunderkind in action (I just had to be a bit, ahem, firm). In a jam-packed hour Doctorow covered a dizzying amount of fascinating and provocative ground, sketching out a history of the recording industry (“Yesterday’s pirates become today’s admirals”) and its relationship to technology and to copyright law, along with the obvious flaws in its tragi-comic approach to addressing contemporary tech challenges, particularly file-sharing. (“Your business is not internet-ready if it criminalises the majority of users.”)

He also delivered detail on Digital Rights Management (DRM): the astounding limitations record and film companies can (and do) now put on your playing pleasure — after you have paid for the recording or recording device and often without your knowledge — and the attendant sinister implications for democracy, free speech, public discourse, communications and so on. Along the way he mentioned some of the organisations dedicated to fighting for free speech and access to knowledge including the Electronic Frontier Foundation and Creative Commons.

He was so concise and generous and droll and instructive, it was really inspirational. Has given me ideas for how to co-ordinate my own little (impending) empire: especially exciting was the rundown on how his award-winning science fiction has been hugely commercially successful despite — or as he says, because — it’s also published free on the Net. His latest novel was released under a Creative Commons license that also allows downloaders in the developing world to sell copies for their own commercial gain: how cool is that? Two days ago I’d never heard of this feisty li’l Canadian; now his books are top of my reading list. All I need is a printer (I frizzled my last one by accidentally adding water).

But best of all for you, dear readers, a local bright spark rejoicing in the ID Delicate Genius recorded the entire lecture and put it on the net here, along with his own sophisticated commentary. Also on his blog here is a rundown of just what’s so bad about DRM. Cory Doctorow’s personal blog is craphound.com, and other relevant links (including to the well-known Boing Boing, which he co-edits) can be found in the Wikipedia entry linked to his name above.

And here, if you just want a taster, is a quote from his Wiki quotes page:

“P2P nets kick all kinds of ass. Most of the books, music and movies ever released are not available for sale, anywhere in the world. In the brief time that P2P nets have flourished, the ad-hoc masses of the Internet have managed to put just about everything online. What’s more, they’ve done it far cheaper than any other archiving/revival effort ever.
Yeah, there are legal problems. Yeah, it’s hard to figure out how people are gonna make money doing it. Yeah, there is a lot of social upheaval and a serious threat to innovation, freedom, business, and whatnot. It’s your basic end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it scenario, and as a science fiction writer, end-of-the-world-as-we-know-it scenaria are my stock-in-trade.”

I forgot to note its original source, but it’s a great snapshot of one of his themes, as well as the man’s hip attitude and style.

Posted in news views cues, people | Comments Off

off to the oracle

Posted by on April 14, 2006

We have met a marvellous white witch. She gave us wise words, scented leaves and chocolate. We are in good hands.

Posted in people | 7 Comments »

Bring out the military and shoot to kill

Posted by on April 13, 2006

When Australia’s Constitution was written in the 1890s, it deliberately limited the federal government’s domestic military powers. The six colonies, giving up their own armies and navies at Federation, insisted that the new national defence forces must not be deployed against Australians, except in the case of a rebellion so vast that the police forces of a state faced being overwhelmed — and then only if the relevant state government appealed for help.

On February 8 2006, federal parliament overrode the Constitution to give John Howard (or any future prime minister) exclusive power to call out the defence forces against Australians on Australian soil. The Howard government claimed the risk of terrorism justified this new law, but the Bill doesn’t mention terrorists. Among the situations it allows the prime minister to quell with troops is any civil protest or industrial dispute that might threaten property.

Achieved by an amendment to Section 119 that directly contravenes Section 118, the Bill also makes soldiers immune to state law when called to turn their guns on fellow citizens, complicates the prosecution of any breaches of criminal law, and allows a defence of ‘following orders’. The Greens proposed an amendment to ensure that either house of parliament could immediately overrule any abuse of this power, but Labor voted with the Coalition to veto the amendment. The Defence Legislation Amendment (Aid to Civilian Authorities) Bill 2006 passed without publicity while the press and public were distracted by the antics of Tony Abbott and the AWB.

(source: www.bobbrown.org.au)

The Parliamentary Education Office’s website states:

“The Constitution may only be changed by a referendum. A referendum is when the parliament asks each Australian over the age of 18 to vote on a special issue. Referenda are held so that the Parliament can determine what Australians think should happen about an issue of national importance. A referendum is only passed if it is approved by a majority of voters in a majority of States and by a majority of voters across the nation as a whole.”

So how did the government get away with making such a profoundly important change to the Constitution without consulting us? Easy. We weren’t paying attention. The price of freedom is eternal vigilance.

Posted in news views cues | 1 Comment »

where do you sit?

Posted by on April 12, 2006

Floored (or rather bedded, though it was nothing like the fun that makes it sound) by the cold virus currently sweeping Sydney (“Three weeks or more you’ll have it, an’ it sucks, I can tell ya now”) I kept thinking I was getting better then finding I was worse again. Until a couple of days ago, when I really did turn the corner, and now it’s all over bar the coughing.

It will delay the completion of the demo by a couple of weeks but fortunately, with the Easter holidays at hand and so not too much modelling work, I’ve been able to focus on the book. The word processor has been running hot… I’ve realised how obsessive I am – when embarked on a project I have no interest in anything else. I get up in the morning and go to the computer, and – apart from short trips to the fridge and the bathroom, I’m there till past midnight…

So for my poor bored devoted readers, here’s a fascinating diversion I found in the course of my research

www.ozpolitics.info
If you already know everything you can bear to about the topic just click on the blog, then on Politics Test.

And for the truly curious, here’s a link to my results. Who’d'a thought, eh?

Posted in news views cues | 3 Comments »